Automated Bit Wear Quantification using Laser Scanning & Topographical Analysis

IP.com Number IPCOM000189325D
thumb 01 thumb 02 thumb 03 thumb 04
Scaled page rendering of the first four pages
Dated Nov 5, 2009 UTC
Size 1 page(s) (34.0 KB)
 

Publication Summary

For many decades, bit wear of firstly steel-tooth, then TCI, and most recently, PDC bits has been quantified using subjective human review of the used bit or even photos of the bit. The IADC Dull Grading method uses guest Imation to report bit wear in fractions (namely 0/8 - 8/8). However, external bit wear is fundamental to correct decisions to select optimal drill bits & features, repair used bits, or even scrap bits. A sub-section of the drilling industry has been attempting to estimate bit wear on "foot-by-foot" data since Bourgoyne & Young published their methodology in 1969. Laser scanning of historical items (European buildings, Renaissance statues, etc.) in recent years has been used to quantify loss of material due to weathering, acid rain, urban pollution, human touching, etc. Geologists are also using the process to evaluate geological features in outcrops. Each drill bit is scanned using laser scanning before and after each bit run and/or repair, and the amount of material lost from either the cutting structure elements of the bit, or the bit body, is quantified and mapped (before and after). Differences for each element can be individually quantified. With the anticipated change in technology (size, cost & usability), scanners would be used next, and finally used on the rig-floor when portable explosion-proof handheld devices come onto the market. Obviously, any oilfield device subjected to wear downhole can also be scanned using this method
Country United States
Language English (United States)

About this Publication

This document was submitted to IP.com's Prior Art Database and this preview is designed to provide you with information regarding the contents of this document by displaying up to the first four pages of the document as scaled page renderings and displaying a limited amount of text which was extracted from the document on the Text Preview Tab.

To find out more on how to obtain the entire document, click the Download tab. There is a charge for downloading some Prior Art Database documents; please examine carefully whether you believe this document fills your needs before purchasing.

For more information about the Prior Art Database, visit the Learn section of this website. Thank you for visiting IP.com's Prior Art Database! You may wish to check out our Global Patent Search website before you leave.

Continue to Text Preview →

This text was extracted from a Microsoft Word document.
This is the abbreviated version, containing approximately 51% of the total text.
This text was extracted from a Microsoft Word document.

Automated Bit Wear Quantification using Laser Scanning & Topographical Analysis

For many decades, bit wear of firstly steel-tooth, then TCI, and most recently, PDC bits has been quantified using subjective human review of the used bit or even photos of the bit. The IADC Dull Grading method uses guest Imation to report bit wear in fractions (namely 0/8 - 8/8). However, external bit wear is fundamental to correct decisions to select optimal drill bits & features, repair used bits, or even scrap bits. A sub-section of the drilling industry has been attempting to estimate bit wear on "foot-by-foot" data since Bourgoyne & Young published their methodology in 1969. Laser scanning of historical items (European buildings, Renaissance statues, etc.) in recent years has been used to quantify loss of material due to weathering, acid rain, urban pollution, human touching, etc. Geologists are also using the process to evaluate geological features in outcrops. Each drill bit is scanned using laser scanning before and after each bit run and/or repair, and the amount of material lost from either the cutting structure elements of the bit, or the bit body, is quantified and mapped (before and after). Differences for each element can be individually quantified. With the anticipated change in technology (size, cost & usability), scanners would be used next, and finally used on the rig-floor when portable explosion-proof handheld devices come onto the market. Obviously, any oilfield device subjected t...

Download This Document →

 

Copyright © 2004-2010 IP.com. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy   |   About IP.com   |   Contact Us